0
0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git synced 2024-12-22 14:26:02 +01:00
gitea/routers/web/repo/setting/protected_branch.go

377 lines
14 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2017 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package setting
import (
"fmt"
"net/http"
"net/url"
"strings"
"time"
git_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/git"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/organization"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/perm"
access_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/perm/access"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/base"
Move macaron to chi (#14293) Use [chi](https://github.com/go-chi/chi) instead of the forked [macaron](https://gitea.com/macaron/macaron). Since macaron and chi have conflicts with session share, this big PR becomes a have-to thing. According my previous idea, we can replace macaron step by step but I'm wrong. :( Below is a list of big changes on this PR. - [x] Define `context.ResponseWriter` interface with an implementation `context.Response`. - [x] Use chi instead of macaron, and also a customize `Route` to wrap chi so that the router usage is similar as before. - [x] Create different routers for `web`, `api`, `internal` and `install` so that the codes will be more clear and no magic . - [x] Use https://github.com/unrolled/render instead of macaron's internal render - [x] Use https://github.com/NYTimes/gziphandler instead of https://gitea.com/macaron/gzip - [x] Use https://gitea.com/go-chi/session which is a modified version of https://gitea.com/macaron/session and removed `nodb` support since it will not be maintained. **BREAK** - [x] Use https://gitea.com/go-chi/captcha which is a modified version of https://gitea.com/macaron/captcha - [x] Use https://gitea.com/go-chi/cache which is a modified version of https://gitea.com/macaron/cache - [x] Use https://gitea.com/go-chi/binding which is a modified version of https://gitea.com/macaron/binding - [x] Use https://github.com/go-chi/cors instead of https://gitea.com/macaron/cors - [x] Dropped https://gitea.com/macaron/i18n and make a new one in `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/translation` - [x] Move validation form structs from `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/auth` to `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/forms` to avoid dependency cycle. - [x] Removed macaron log service because it's not need any more. **BREAK** - [x] All form structs have to be get by `web.GetForm(ctx)` in the route function but not as a function parameter on routes definition. - [x] Move Git HTTP protocol implementation to use routers directly. - [x] Fix the problem that chi routes don't support trailing slash but macaron did. - [x] `/api/v1/swagger` now will be redirect to `/api/swagger` but not render directly so that `APIContext` will not create a html render. Notices: - Chi router don't support request with trailing slash - Integration test `TestUserHeatmap` maybe mysql version related. It's failed on my macOS(mysql 5.7.29 installed via brew) but succeed on CI. Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2021-01-26 16:36:53 +01:00
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/web"
Use frontend fetch for branch dropdown component (#25719) - Send request to get branch/tag list, use loading icon when waiting for response. - Only fetch when the first time branch/tag list shows. - For backend, removed assignment to `ctx.Data["Branches"]` and `ctx.Data["Tags"]` from `context/repo.go` and passed these data wherever needed. - Changed some `v-if` to `v-show` and used native `svg` as mentioned in https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25719#issuecomment-1631712757 to improve perfomance when there are a lot of branches. - Places Used the dropdown component: Repo Home Page <img width="1429" alt="Screen Shot 2023-07-06 at 12 17 51" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/17645053/6accc7b6-8d37-4e88-ae1a-bd2b3b927ea0"> Commits Page <img width="1431" alt="Screen Shot 2023-07-06 at 12 18 34" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/17645053/2d0bf306-d1e2-45a8-a784-bc424879f537"> Specific commit -> operations -> cherry-pick <img width="758" alt="Screen Shot 2023-07-06 at 12 23 28" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/17645053/1e557948-3881-4e45-a625-8ef36d45ae2d"> Release Page <img width="1433" alt="Screen Shot 2023-07-06 at 12 25 05" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/17645053/3ec82af1-15a4-4162-a50b-04a9502161bb"> - Demo https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/17645053/d45d266b-3eb0-465a-82f9-57f78dc5f9f3 - Note: UI of dropdown menu could be improved in another PR as it should apply to more dropdown menus. Fix #14180 --------- Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io> Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-07-21 13:20:04 +02:00
"code.gitea.io/gitea/routers/web/repo"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/services/forms"
[Enhancement] Allow admin to merge pr with protected file changes (#12078) * [Enhancement] Allow admin to merge pr with protected file changes As tilte, show protected message in diff page and merge box. Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com> * remove unused ver * Update options/locale/locale_en-US.ini Co-authored-by: Cirno the Strongest <1447794+CirnoT@users.noreply.github.com> * Add TrN * Apply suggestions from code review * fix lint * Update options/locale/locale_en-US.ini Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net> * Apply suggestions from code review * move pr proteced files check to TestPatch * Call TestPatch when protected branches settings changed * Apply review suggestion @CirnoT * move to service @lunny * slightly restructure routers/private/hook.go Adds a lot of comments and simplifies the logic Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * placate lint Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * skip duplicate protected files check * fix check logic * slight refactor of TestPatch Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * When checking for protected files changes in TestPatch use the temporary repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * fix introduced issue with hook Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Remove the check on PR index being greater than 0 as it unnecessary Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net> Co-authored-by: Cirno the Strongest <1447794+CirnoT@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2020-10-13 20:50:57 +02:00
pull_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/pull"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/services/repository"
"github.com/gobwas/glob"
)
const (
tplProtectedBranch base.TplName = "repo/settings/protected_branch"
)
// ProtectedBranchRules render the page to protect the repository
func ProtectedBranchRules(ctx *context.Context) {
ctx.Data["Title"] = ctx.Tr("repo.settings.branches")
ctx.Data["PageIsSettingsBranches"] = true
rules, err := git_model.FindRepoProtectedBranchRules(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID)
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("GetProtectedBranches", err)
return
}
ctx.Data["ProtectedBranches"] = rules
Use frontend fetch for branch dropdown component (#25719) - Send request to get branch/tag list, use loading icon when waiting for response. - Only fetch when the first time branch/tag list shows. - For backend, removed assignment to `ctx.Data["Branches"]` and `ctx.Data["Tags"]` from `context/repo.go` and passed these data wherever needed. - Changed some `v-if` to `v-show` and used native `svg` as mentioned in https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25719#issuecomment-1631712757 to improve perfomance when there are a lot of branches. - Places Used the dropdown component: Repo Home Page <img width="1429" alt="Screen Shot 2023-07-06 at 12 17 51" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/17645053/6accc7b6-8d37-4e88-ae1a-bd2b3b927ea0"> Commits Page <img width="1431" alt="Screen Shot 2023-07-06 at 12 18 34" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/17645053/2d0bf306-d1e2-45a8-a784-bc424879f537"> Specific commit -> operations -> cherry-pick <img width="758" alt="Screen Shot 2023-07-06 at 12 23 28" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/17645053/1e557948-3881-4e45-a625-8ef36d45ae2d"> Release Page <img width="1433" alt="Screen Shot 2023-07-06 at 12 25 05" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/17645053/3ec82af1-15a4-4162-a50b-04a9502161bb"> - Demo https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/17645053/d45d266b-3eb0-465a-82f9-57f78dc5f9f3 - Note: UI of dropdown menu could be improved in another PR as it should apply to more dropdown menus. Fix #14180 --------- Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io> Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-07-21 13:20:04 +02:00
repo.PrepareBranchList(ctx)
if ctx.Written() {
return
}
ctx.HTML(http.StatusOK, tplBranches)
}
// SettingsProtectedBranch renders the protected branch setting page
func SettingsProtectedBranch(c *context.Context) {
ruleName := c.FormString("rule_name")
var rule *git_model.ProtectedBranch
if ruleName != "" {
var err error
rule, err = git_model.GetProtectedBranchRuleByName(c, c.Repo.Repository.ID, ruleName)
if err != nil {
c.ServerError("GetProtectBranchOfRepoByName", err)
return
}
}
if rule == nil {
// No options found, create defaults.
rule = &git_model.ProtectedBranch{}
}
c.Data["PageIsSettingsBranches"] = true
c.Data["Title"] = c.Locale.TrString("repo.settings.protected_branch") + " - " + rule.RuleName
users, err := access_model.GetRepoReaders(c, c.Repo.Repository)
if err != nil {
c.ServerError("Repo.Repository.GetReaders", err)
return
}
c.Data["Users"] = users
c.Data["whitelist_users"] = strings.Join(base.Int64sToStrings(rule.WhitelistUserIDs), ",")
Allow force push to protected branches (#28086) Fixes #22722 ### Problem Currently, it is not possible to force push to a branch with branch protection rules in place. There are often times where this is necessary (CI workflows/administrative tasks etc). The current workaround is to rename/remove the branch protection, perform the force push, and then reinstate the protections. ### Solution Provide an additional section in the branch protection rules to allow users to specify which users with push access can also force push to the branch. The default value of the rule will be set to `Disabled`, and the UI is intuitive and very similar to the `Push` section. It is worth noting in this implementation that allowing force push does not override regular push access, and both will need to be enabled for a user to force push. This applies to manual force push to a remote, and also in Gitea UI updating a PR by rebase (which requires force push) This modifies the `BranchProtection` API structs to add: - `enable_force_push bool` - `enable_force_push_whitelist bool` - `force_push_whitelist_usernames string[]` - `force_push_whitelist_teams string[]` - `force_push_whitelist_deploy_keys bool` ### Updated Branch Protection UI: <img width="943" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/7491899c-d816-45d5-be84-8512abd156bf"> ### Pull Request `Update branch by Rebase` option enabled with source branch `test` being a protected branch: ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/e018e6e9-b7b2-4bd3-808e-4947d7da35cc) <img width="1038" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/57ead13e-9006-459f-b83c-7079e6f4c654"> --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-07-05 20:21:56 +02:00
c.Data["force_push_allowlist_users"] = strings.Join(base.Int64sToStrings(rule.ForcePushAllowlistUserIDs), ",")
c.Data["merge_whitelist_users"] = strings.Join(base.Int64sToStrings(rule.MergeWhitelistUserIDs), ",")
c.Data["approvals_whitelist_users"] = strings.Join(base.Int64sToStrings(rule.ApprovalsWhitelistUserIDs), ",")
c.Data["status_check_contexts"] = strings.Join(rule.StatusCheckContexts, "\n")
contexts, _ := git_model.FindRepoRecentCommitStatusContexts(c, c.Repo.Repository.ID, 7*24*time.Hour) // Find last week status check contexts
c.Data["recent_status_checks"] = contexts
if c.Repo.Owner.IsOrganization() {
teams, err := organization.OrgFromUser(c.Repo.Owner).TeamsWithAccessToRepo(c, c.Repo.Repository.ID, perm.AccessModeRead)
if err != nil {
c.ServerError("Repo.Owner.TeamsWithAccessToRepo", err)
return
}
c.Data["Teams"] = teams
c.Data["whitelist_teams"] = strings.Join(base.Int64sToStrings(rule.WhitelistTeamIDs), ",")
Allow force push to protected branches (#28086) Fixes #22722 ### Problem Currently, it is not possible to force push to a branch with branch protection rules in place. There are often times where this is necessary (CI workflows/administrative tasks etc). The current workaround is to rename/remove the branch protection, perform the force push, and then reinstate the protections. ### Solution Provide an additional section in the branch protection rules to allow users to specify which users with push access can also force push to the branch. The default value of the rule will be set to `Disabled`, and the UI is intuitive and very similar to the `Push` section. It is worth noting in this implementation that allowing force push does not override regular push access, and both will need to be enabled for a user to force push. This applies to manual force push to a remote, and also in Gitea UI updating a PR by rebase (which requires force push) This modifies the `BranchProtection` API structs to add: - `enable_force_push bool` - `enable_force_push_whitelist bool` - `force_push_whitelist_usernames string[]` - `force_push_whitelist_teams string[]` - `force_push_whitelist_deploy_keys bool` ### Updated Branch Protection UI: <img width="943" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/7491899c-d816-45d5-be84-8512abd156bf"> ### Pull Request `Update branch by Rebase` option enabled with source branch `test` being a protected branch: ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/e018e6e9-b7b2-4bd3-808e-4947d7da35cc) <img width="1038" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/57ead13e-9006-459f-b83c-7079e6f4c654"> --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-07-05 20:21:56 +02:00
c.Data["force_push_allowlist_teams"] = strings.Join(base.Int64sToStrings(rule.ForcePushAllowlistTeamIDs), ",")
c.Data["merge_whitelist_teams"] = strings.Join(base.Int64sToStrings(rule.MergeWhitelistTeamIDs), ",")
c.Data["approvals_whitelist_teams"] = strings.Join(base.Int64sToStrings(rule.ApprovalsWhitelistTeamIDs), ",")
}
c.Data["Rule"] = rule
c.HTML(http.StatusOK, tplProtectedBranch)
}
// SettingsProtectedBranchPost updates the protected branch settings
Move macaron to chi (#14293) Use [chi](https://github.com/go-chi/chi) instead of the forked [macaron](https://gitea.com/macaron/macaron). Since macaron and chi have conflicts with session share, this big PR becomes a have-to thing. According my previous idea, we can replace macaron step by step but I'm wrong. :( Below is a list of big changes on this PR. - [x] Define `context.ResponseWriter` interface with an implementation `context.Response`. - [x] Use chi instead of macaron, and also a customize `Route` to wrap chi so that the router usage is similar as before. - [x] Create different routers for `web`, `api`, `internal` and `install` so that the codes will be more clear and no magic . - [x] Use https://github.com/unrolled/render instead of macaron's internal render - [x] Use https://github.com/NYTimes/gziphandler instead of https://gitea.com/macaron/gzip - [x] Use https://gitea.com/go-chi/session which is a modified version of https://gitea.com/macaron/session and removed `nodb` support since it will not be maintained. **BREAK** - [x] Use https://gitea.com/go-chi/captcha which is a modified version of https://gitea.com/macaron/captcha - [x] Use https://gitea.com/go-chi/cache which is a modified version of https://gitea.com/macaron/cache - [x] Use https://gitea.com/go-chi/binding which is a modified version of https://gitea.com/macaron/binding - [x] Use https://github.com/go-chi/cors instead of https://gitea.com/macaron/cors - [x] Dropped https://gitea.com/macaron/i18n and make a new one in `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/translation` - [x] Move validation form structs from `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/auth` to `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/forms` to avoid dependency cycle. - [x] Removed macaron log service because it's not need any more. **BREAK** - [x] All form structs have to be get by `web.GetForm(ctx)` in the route function but not as a function parameter on routes definition. - [x] Move Git HTTP protocol implementation to use routers directly. - [x] Fix the problem that chi routes don't support trailing slash but macaron did. - [x] `/api/v1/swagger` now will be redirect to `/api/swagger` but not render directly so that `APIContext` will not create a html render. Notices: - Chi router don't support request with trailing slash - Integration test `TestUserHeatmap` maybe mysql version related. It's failed on my macOS(mysql 5.7.29 installed via brew) but succeed on CI. Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2021-01-26 16:36:53 +01:00
func SettingsProtectedBranchPost(ctx *context.Context) {
f := web.GetForm(ctx).(*forms.ProtectBranchForm)
var protectBranch *git_model.ProtectedBranch
if f.RuleName == "" {
ctx.Flash.Error(ctx.Tr("repo.settings.protected_branch_required_rule_name"))
ctx.Redirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/settings/branches/edit", ctx.Repo.RepoLink))
return
}
var err error
if f.RuleID > 0 {
// If the RuleID isn't 0, it must be an edit operation. So we get rule by id.
protectBranch, err = git_model.GetProtectedBranchRuleByID(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID, f.RuleID)
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("GetProtectBranchOfRepoByID", err)
return
}
if protectBranch != nil && protectBranch.RuleName != f.RuleName {
// RuleName changed. We need to check if there is a rule with the same name.
// If a rule with the same name exists, an error should be returned.
sameNameProtectBranch, err := git_model.GetProtectedBranchRuleByName(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID, f.RuleName)
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("GetProtectBranchOfRepoByName", err)
return
}
if sameNameProtectBranch != nil {
ctx.Flash.Error(ctx.Tr("repo.settings.protected_branch_duplicate_rule_name"))
ctx.Redirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/settings/branches/edit?rule_name=%s", ctx.Repo.RepoLink, protectBranch.RuleName))
return
}
}
} else {
// FIXME: If a new ProtectBranch has a duplicate RuleName, an error should be returned.
// Currently, if a new ProtectBranch with a duplicate RuleName is created, the existing ProtectBranch will be updated.
// But we cannot modify this logic now because many unit tests rely on it.
protectBranch, err = git_model.GetProtectedBranchRuleByName(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID, f.RuleName)
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("GetProtectBranchOfRepoByName", err)
return
}
}
if protectBranch == nil {
// No options found, create defaults.
protectBranch = &git_model.ProtectedBranch{
RepoID: ctx.Repo.Repository.ID,
RuleName: f.RuleName,
}
}
Allow force push to protected branches (#28086) Fixes #22722 ### Problem Currently, it is not possible to force push to a branch with branch protection rules in place. There are often times where this is necessary (CI workflows/administrative tasks etc). The current workaround is to rename/remove the branch protection, perform the force push, and then reinstate the protections. ### Solution Provide an additional section in the branch protection rules to allow users to specify which users with push access can also force push to the branch. The default value of the rule will be set to `Disabled`, and the UI is intuitive and very similar to the `Push` section. It is worth noting in this implementation that allowing force push does not override regular push access, and both will need to be enabled for a user to force push. This applies to manual force push to a remote, and also in Gitea UI updating a PR by rebase (which requires force push) This modifies the `BranchProtection` API structs to add: - `enable_force_push bool` - `enable_force_push_whitelist bool` - `force_push_whitelist_usernames string[]` - `force_push_whitelist_teams string[]` - `force_push_whitelist_deploy_keys bool` ### Updated Branch Protection UI: <img width="943" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/7491899c-d816-45d5-be84-8512abd156bf"> ### Pull Request `Update branch by Rebase` option enabled with source branch `test` being a protected branch: ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/e018e6e9-b7b2-4bd3-808e-4947d7da35cc) <img width="1038" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/57ead13e-9006-459f-b83c-7079e6f4c654"> --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-07-05 20:21:56 +02:00
var whitelistUsers, whitelistTeams, forcePushAllowlistUsers, forcePushAllowlistTeams, mergeWhitelistUsers, mergeWhitelistTeams, approvalsWhitelistUsers, approvalsWhitelistTeams []int64
protectBranch.RuleName = f.RuleName
if f.RequiredApprovals < 0 {
ctx.Flash.Error(ctx.Tr("repo.settings.protected_branch_required_approvals_min"))
ctx.Redirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/settings/branches/edit?rule_name=%s", ctx.Repo.RepoLink, f.RuleName))
return
}
switch f.EnablePush {
case "all":
protectBranch.CanPush = true
protectBranch.EnableWhitelist = false
protectBranch.WhitelistDeployKeys = false
case "whitelist":
protectBranch.CanPush = true
protectBranch.EnableWhitelist = true
protectBranch.WhitelistDeployKeys = f.WhitelistDeployKeys
if strings.TrimSpace(f.WhitelistUsers) != "" {
whitelistUsers, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.WhitelistUsers, ","))
}
if strings.TrimSpace(f.WhitelistTeams) != "" {
whitelistTeams, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.WhitelistTeams, ","))
}
default:
protectBranch.CanPush = false
protectBranch.EnableWhitelist = false
protectBranch.WhitelistDeployKeys = false
}
Allow force push to protected branches (#28086) Fixes #22722 ### Problem Currently, it is not possible to force push to a branch with branch protection rules in place. There are often times where this is necessary (CI workflows/administrative tasks etc). The current workaround is to rename/remove the branch protection, perform the force push, and then reinstate the protections. ### Solution Provide an additional section in the branch protection rules to allow users to specify which users with push access can also force push to the branch. The default value of the rule will be set to `Disabled`, and the UI is intuitive and very similar to the `Push` section. It is worth noting in this implementation that allowing force push does not override regular push access, and both will need to be enabled for a user to force push. This applies to manual force push to a remote, and also in Gitea UI updating a PR by rebase (which requires force push) This modifies the `BranchProtection` API structs to add: - `enable_force_push bool` - `enable_force_push_whitelist bool` - `force_push_whitelist_usernames string[]` - `force_push_whitelist_teams string[]` - `force_push_whitelist_deploy_keys bool` ### Updated Branch Protection UI: <img width="943" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/7491899c-d816-45d5-be84-8512abd156bf"> ### Pull Request `Update branch by Rebase` option enabled with source branch `test` being a protected branch: ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/e018e6e9-b7b2-4bd3-808e-4947d7da35cc) <img width="1038" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/57ead13e-9006-459f-b83c-7079e6f4c654"> --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-07-05 20:21:56 +02:00
switch f.EnableForcePush {
case "all":
protectBranch.CanForcePush = true
protectBranch.EnableForcePushAllowlist = false
protectBranch.ForcePushAllowlistDeployKeys = false
case "whitelist":
protectBranch.CanForcePush = true
protectBranch.EnableForcePushAllowlist = true
protectBranch.ForcePushAllowlistDeployKeys = f.ForcePushAllowlistDeployKeys
if strings.TrimSpace(f.ForcePushAllowlistUsers) != "" {
forcePushAllowlistUsers, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.ForcePushAllowlistUsers, ","))
}
if strings.TrimSpace(f.ForcePushAllowlistTeams) != "" {
forcePushAllowlistTeams, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.ForcePushAllowlistTeams, ","))
}
default:
protectBranch.CanForcePush = false
protectBranch.EnableForcePushAllowlist = false
protectBranch.ForcePushAllowlistDeployKeys = false
}
protectBranch.EnableMergeWhitelist = f.EnableMergeWhitelist
if f.EnableMergeWhitelist {
if strings.TrimSpace(f.MergeWhitelistUsers) != "" {
mergeWhitelistUsers, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.MergeWhitelistUsers, ","))
}
if strings.TrimSpace(f.MergeWhitelistTeams) != "" {
mergeWhitelistTeams, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.MergeWhitelistTeams, ","))
}
}
protectBranch.EnableStatusCheck = f.EnableStatusCheck
if f.EnableStatusCheck {
patterns := strings.Split(strings.ReplaceAll(f.StatusCheckContexts, "\r", "\n"), "\n")
validPatterns := make([]string, 0, len(patterns))
for _, pattern := range patterns {
trimmed := strings.TrimSpace(pattern)
if trimmed == "" {
continue
}
if _, err := glob.Compile(trimmed); err != nil {
ctx.Flash.Error(ctx.Tr("repo.settings.protect_invalid_status_check_pattern", pattern))
ctx.Redirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/settings/branches/edit?rule_name=%s", ctx.Repo.RepoLink, url.QueryEscape(protectBranch.RuleName)))
return
}
validPatterns = append(validPatterns, trimmed)
}
if len(validPatterns) == 0 {
// if status check is enabled, patterns slice is not allowed to be empty
ctx.Flash.Error(ctx.Tr("repo.settings.protect_no_valid_status_check_patterns"))
ctx.Redirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/settings/branches/edit?rule_name=%s", ctx.Repo.RepoLink, url.QueryEscape(protectBranch.RuleName)))
return
}
protectBranch.StatusCheckContexts = validPatterns
} else {
protectBranch.StatusCheckContexts = nil
}
protectBranch.RequiredApprovals = f.RequiredApprovals
protectBranch.EnableApprovalsWhitelist = f.EnableApprovalsWhitelist
if f.EnableApprovalsWhitelist {
if strings.TrimSpace(f.ApprovalsWhitelistUsers) != "" {
approvalsWhitelistUsers, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.ApprovalsWhitelistUsers, ","))
}
if strings.TrimSpace(f.ApprovalsWhitelistTeams) != "" {
approvalsWhitelistTeams, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.ApprovalsWhitelistTeams, ","))
}
}
protectBranch.BlockOnRejectedReviews = f.BlockOnRejectedReviews
protectBranch.BlockOnOfficialReviewRequests = f.BlockOnOfficialReviewRequests
protectBranch.DismissStaleApprovals = f.DismissStaleApprovals
protectBranch.IgnoreStaleApprovals = f.IgnoreStaleApprovals
protectBranch.RequireSignedCommits = f.RequireSignedCommits
protectBranch.ProtectedFilePatterns = f.ProtectedFilePatterns
protectBranch.UnprotectedFilePatterns = f.UnprotectedFilePatterns
protectBranch.BlockOnOutdatedBranch = f.BlockOnOutdatedBranch
protectBranch.BlockAdminMergeOverride = f.BlockAdminMergeOverride
err = git_model.UpdateProtectBranch(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository, protectBranch, git_model.WhitelistOptions{
UserIDs: whitelistUsers,
TeamIDs: whitelistTeams,
Allow force push to protected branches (#28086) Fixes #22722 ### Problem Currently, it is not possible to force push to a branch with branch protection rules in place. There are often times where this is necessary (CI workflows/administrative tasks etc). The current workaround is to rename/remove the branch protection, perform the force push, and then reinstate the protections. ### Solution Provide an additional section in the branch protection rules to allow users to specify which users with push access can also force push to the branch. The default value of the rule will be set to `Disabled`, and the UI is intuitive and very similar to the `Push` section. It is worth noting in this implementation that allowing force push does not override regular push access, and both will need to be enabled for a user to force push. This applies to manual force push to a remote, and also in Gitea UI updating a PR by rebase (which requires force push) This modifies the `BranchProtection` API structs to add: - `enable_force_push bool` - `enable_force_push_whitelist bool` - `force_push_whitelist_usernames string[]` - `force_push_whitelist_teams string[]` - `force_push_whitelist_deploy_keys bool` ### Updated Branch Protection UI: <img width="943" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/7491899c-d816-45d5-be84-8512abd156bf"> ### Pull Request `Update branch by Rebase` option enabled with source branch `test` being a protected branch: ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/e018e6e9-b7b2-4bd3-808e-4947d7da35cc) <img width="1038" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/57ead13e-9006-459f-b83c-7079e6f4c654"> --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-07-05 20:21:56 +02:00
ForcePushUserIDs: forcePushAllowlistUsers,
ForcePushTeamIDs: forcePushAllowlistTeams,
MergeUserIDs: mergeWhitelistUsers,
MergeTeamIDs: mergeWhitelistTeams,
ApprovalsUserIDs: approvalsWhitelistUsers,
ApprovalsTeamIDs: approvalsWhitelistTeams,
})
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("UpdateProtectBranch", err)
return
}
// FIXME: since we only need to recheck files protected rules, we could improve this
matchedBranches, err := git_model.FindAllMatchedBranches(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID, protectBranch.RuleName)
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("FindAllMatchedBranches", err)
return
}
for _, branchName := range matchedBranches {
if err = pull_service.CheckPRsForBaseBranch(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository, branchName); err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("CheckPRsForBaseBranch", err)
[Enhancement] Allow admin to merge pr with protected file changes (#12078) * [Enhancement] Allow admin to merge pr with protected file changes As tilte, show protected message in diff page and merge box. Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com> * remove unused ver * Update options/locale/locale_en-US.ini Co-authored-by: Cirno the Strongest <1447794+CirnoT@users.noreply.github.com> * Add TrN * Apply suggestions from code review * fix lint * Update options/locale/locale_en-US.ini Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net> * Apply suggestions from code review * move pr proteced files check to TestPatch * Call TestPatch when protected branches settings changed * Apply review suggestion @CirnoT * move to service @lunny * slightly restructure routers/private/hook.go Adds a lot of comments and simplifies the logic Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * placate lint Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * skip duplicate protected files check * fix check logic * slight refactor of TestPatch Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * When checking for protected files changes in TestPatch use the temporary repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * fix introduced issue with hook Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Remove the check on PR index being greater than 0 as it unnecessary Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net> Co-authored-by: Cirno the Strongest <1447794+CirnoT@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2020-10-13 20:50:57 +02:00
return
}
}
ctx.Flash.Success(ctx.Tr("repo.settings.update_protect_branch_success", protectBranch.RuleName))
ctx.Redirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/settings/branches?rule_name=%s", ctx.Repo.RepoLink, protectBranch.RuleName))
}
// DeleteProtectedBranchRulePost delete protected branch rule by id
func DeleteProtectedBranchRulePost(ctx *context.Context) {
ruleID := ctx.PathParamInt64("id")
if ruleID <= 0 {
ctx.Flash.Error(ctx.Tr("repo.settings.remove_protected_branch_failed", fmt.Sprintf("%d", ruleID)))
ctx.JSONRedirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/settings/branches", ctx.Repo.RepoLink))
return
}
rule, err := git_model.GetProtectedBranchRuleByID(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID, ruleID)
if err != nil {
ctx.Flash.Error(ctx.Tr("repo.settings.remove_protected_branch_failed", fmt.Sprintf("%d", ruleID)))
ctx.JSONRedirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/settings/branches", ctx.Repo.RepoLink))
return
}
if rule == nil {
ctx.Flash.Error(ctx.Tr("repo.settings.remove_protected_branch_failed", fmt.Sprintf("%d", ruleID)))
ctx.JSONRedirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/settings/branches", ctx.Repo.RepoLink))
return
}
if err := git_model.DeleteProtectedBranch(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository, ruleID); err != nil {
ctx.Flash.Error(ctx.Tr("repo.settings.remove_protected_branch_failed", rule.RuleName))
ctx.JSONRedirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/settings/branches", ctx.Repo.RepoLink))
return
}
ctx.Flash.Success(ctx.Tr("repo.settings.remove_protected_branch_success", rule.RuleName))
ctx.JSONRedirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/settings/branches", ctx.Repo.RepoLink))
}
func UpdateBranchProtectionPriories(ctx *context.Context) {
form := web.GetForm(ctx).(*forms.ProtectBranchPriorityForm)
repo := ctx.Repo.Repository
if err := git_model.UpdateProtectBranchPriorities(ctx, repo, form.IDs); err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("UpdateProtectBranchPriorities", err)
return
}
}
// RenameBranchPost responses for rename a branch
func RenameBranchPost(ctx *context.Context) {
form := web.GetForm(ctx).(*forms.RenameBranchForm)
if !ctx.Repo.CanCreateBranch() {
ctx.NotFound("RenameBranch", nil)
return
}
if ctx.HasError() {
ctx.Flash.Error(ctx.GetErrMsg())
ctx.Redirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/branches", ctx.Repo.RepoLink))
return
}
msg, err := repository.RenameBranch(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository, ctx.Doer, ctx.Repo.GitRepo, form.From, form.To)
if err != nil {
switch {
case git_model.IsErrBranchAlreadyExists(err):
ctx.Flash.Error(ctx.Tr("repo.branch.branch_already_exists", form.To))
ctx.Redirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/branches", ctx.Repo.RepoLink))
default:
ctx.ServerError("RenameBranch", err)
}
return
}
if msg == "target_exist" {
ctx.Flash.Error(ctx.Tr("repo.settings.rename_branch_failed_exist", form.To))
ctx.Redirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/branches", ctx.Repo.RepoLink))
return
}
if msg == "from_not_exist" {
ctx.Flash.Error(ctx.Tr("repo.settings.rename_branch_failed_not_exist", form.From))
ctx.Redirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/branches", ctx.Repo.RepoLink))
return
}
ctx.Flash.Success(ctx.Tr("repo.settings.rename_branch_success", form.From, form.To))
ctx.Redirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/branches", ctx.Repo.RepoLink))
}