* consolidate author name across timeline
* Sync with master
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
* Add a way to mark Conversation (code comment) resolved
mark Conversation is a way to mark a Conversation is stale
or be solved. when it's marked as stale, will be hided like
stale. all Pull Request writer , Offical Reviewers and poster
can add or remove Conversation resolved mark.
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* fix lint
* Apply suggestions from code review
* Add ResolveDoer
* fix ui
Co-Authored-By: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-Authored-By: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* change IsResolved to an function
Add permission check in UpdateResolveConversation
* Apply suggestions from code review
* change return error for permisson check
* add default message for deleted user
* get issue message from comment
* add migration for ``ResolveDoerID`` column
another change:
* block mark pending review as resolved because it's not necessary
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* change button color
* resolve button size
* fix code style
* remove unusefull code
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
It is possible for misconfigured protected branches to have required status checks that are not in any of the current statuses: Pending, Success, Error, Failure, or Warning - presumably because the CI has not contacted us as yet.
Fix#10636 by adding case: missing StatusChecks when these are missing
* Cache PullRequest Divergence
* only re-calc divergence if AddTestPullRequestTask() is exec
* migrate already open pulls
* finalize
* take care of closed¬-merged+deleted-branch pull requests
* fix nil pointer exeption
Signed-off-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* try this
* no error its a warn
* init gitea-repositories-meta
* dont use gitDivergence type
* CI.restart()
* CI.restart()
* CI.restart()
* CI.restart()
* check IsUserAllowedToUpdate independend from CommitsBehind
* add request review feature in pull request
add a way to notify specific reviewers to review like github , by add or delet a special type
review . The acton is is similar to Assign , so many code reuse the function and items of
Assignee, but the meaning and result is different.
The Permission style is is similar to github, that only writer can add a review request from Reviewers,
but the poster can recall and remove a review request after a reviwer has revied even if he don't have
Write Premission. only manager , the poster and reviewer of a request review can remove it.
The reviewers can be requested to review contain all readers for private repo , for public, contain
all writers and watchers.
The offical Review Request will block merge if Reject can block it.
an other change: add ui otify for Assignees.
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* new change
* add placeholder string
* do some changes follow #10238 to add review requests num on lists also
change icon for review requests to eye
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* ui: add more message on sidebar menus
* add title on the menus
* show some message instead of hide choose bar when have nothing to choose
* add simply filter for each menus
* do same changes in mew_form.tmpl
* remove some unusefull comments in mew_form.tmpl
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* do review suggestions
* add filter message on sidebar filter
* change IsIssueWriter to HasIssuesOrPullsWritePermission
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* change the icon of ApproveReview pr from "eye" to "check" like github
* change the icon of RejectReview pr from "x" to "request-change" like github
* add "-" after "{{" which need to be one line (TODO: may be not change all)
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add organization wide labels
Implement organization wide labels similar to organization wide
webhooks. This lets you create individual labels for organizations that can be used
for all repos under that organization (so being able to reuse the same
label across multiple repos).
This makes it possible for small organizations with many repos to use
labels effectively.
Fixes#7406
* Add migration
* remove comments
* fix tests
* Update options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
Removed unused translation string
* show org labels in issue search label filter
* Use more clear var name
* rename migration after merge from master
* comment typo
* update migration again after rebase with master
* check for orgID <=0 per guillep2k review
* fmt
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-Authored-By: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* remove unused code
* Make sure RepoID is 0 when searching orgID per code review
* more changes/code review requests
* More descriptive translation var per code review
* func description/delete comment when issue label deleted instead of hiding it
* remove comment
* only use issues in that repo when calculating number of open issues for org label on repo label page
* Add integration test for IssuesSearch API with labels
* remove unused function
* Update models/issue_label.go
Co-Authored-By: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* Use subquery in GetLabelIDsInReposByNames
* Fix tests to use correct orgID
* fix more tests
* IssuesSearch api now uses new BuildLabelNamesIssueIDsCondition. Add a few more tests as well
* update comment for clarity
* Revert previous code change now that we can use the new BuildLabelNamesIssueIDsCondition
* Don't sort repos by date in IssuesSearch API
After much debugging I've found a strange issue where in some cases MySQL will return a different result than other enigines if a query is sorted by a null collumn. For example with our integration test data where we don't set updated_unix in repository fixtures:
SELECT `id`, `owner_id`, `owner_name`, `lower_name`, `name`, `description`, `website`, `original_service_type`, `original_url`, `default_branch`, `num_watches`, `num_stars`, `num_forks`, `num_issues`, `num_closed_issues`, `num_pulls`, `num_closed_pulls`, `num_milestones`, `num_closed_milestones`, `is_private`, `is_empty`, `is_archived`, `is_mirror`, `status`, `is_fork`, `fork_id`, `is_template`, `template_id`, `size`, `is_fsck_enabled`, `close_issues_via_commit_in_any_branch`, `topics`, `avatar`, `created_unix`, `updated_unix` FROM `repository` ORDER BY updated_unix DESC LIMIT 15 OFFSET 45
Returns different results for MySQL than other engines. However, the similar query:
SELECT `id`, `owner_id`, `owner_name`, `lower_name`, `name`, `description`, `website`, `original_service_type`, `original_url`, `default_branch`, `num_watches`, `num_stars`, `num_forks`, `num_issues`, `num_closed_issues`, `num_pulls`, `num_closed_pulls`, `num_milestones`, `num_closed_milestones`, `is_private`, `is_empty`, `is_archived`, `is_mirror`, `status`, `is_fork`, `fork_id`, `is_template`, `template_id`, `size`, `is_fsck_enabled`, `close_issues_via_commit_in_any_branch`, `topics`, `avatar`, `created_unix`, `updated_unix` FROM `repository` ORDER BY updated_unix DESC LIMIT 15 OFFSET 30
Returns the same results.
This causes integration tests to fail on MySQL in certain cases but would never show up in a real installation. Since this API call always returns issues based on the optionally provided repo_priority_id or the issueID itself, there is no change to results by changing the repo sorting method used to get ids earlier in the function.
* linter is back!
* code review
* remove now unused option
* Fix newline at end of files
* more unused code
* update to master
* check for matching ids before query
* Update models/issue_label.go
Co-Authored-By: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* Update models/issue_label.go
* update comments
* Update routers/org/setting.go
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
reason:
If user can't choose the Assignees labels and Milestone It's
not usefull to show a gear label , and it It will mislead the
user into thinking that it's a BUG rather than thy don't have
permission to chosse them.
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* Change action GETs to POST
* submite = submit + smite
* No more # href
* Fix test
* Match other tests
* Explicit csrf
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* Only show conflicted files if not merged
* try again
Co-authored-by: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net>
* fix typo
* Migrate reviews when migrating repository from github
* fix lint
* Added test and migration when external user login
* fix test
* fix commented state
* Some improvements
* fix bug when get pull request and ref original author on code comments
* Fix migrated line; Added comment for review
* Don't load all pull requests attributes
* Fix typo
* wrong change copy head
* fix tests
* fix reactions
* Fix test
* fix fmt
* fix review comment reactions
* Fix wrong hint when status checking is running on pull request view
* fix lint
* fix test
* fix test
* fix wrong tmpl
* fix import
* rename function name
* fixed link to issue in issue comments after adding/removing a dependency, before links assumed the issue was in the same repository. also changed the format of the displayed issue since the issue will not necessarily be in the same repo
* based on pr comments, changed to use HTMLURL instead of piecing together the issue url, and added an if statement around the issue link display as a nil protection
* only showing repo name in dependency comment if the issue is from another repo
Co-authored-by: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fix wrong permissions check when issues/prs shared operations
* move redirect to the last of the function
* fix swagger
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* Change won't sign information text to black.
* icon and text same color
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com>
* Admin shall be able to bypass merge checks.
* Repository admin should not bypass if merge whitelist is set.
* Add code comment about checks that PR are ready
* notAllOverrideableChecksOk->notAllOverridableChecksOk
* Fix merge, require signed currently not overridable.
* fix
Co-authored-by: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add require signed commit for protected branch
* Fix fmt
* Make editor show if they will be signed
* bugfix
* Add basic merge check and better information for CRUD
* linting comment
* Add descriptors to merge signing
* Slight refactor
* Slight improvement to appearances
* Handle Merge API
* manage CRUD API
* Move error to error.go
* Remove fix to delete.go
* prep for merge
* need to tolerate \r\n in message
* check protected branch before trying to load it
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-Authored-By: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix commit-reader
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Fix#5997.
If a push causes the patch/diff of a PR towards target branch to change, all existing reviews for the PR will be set and shown as stale.
New branch protection option to dismiss stale approvals are added.
To show that a review is not based on the latest PR changes, an hourglass is shown
Once a branch has been merged if the commit ID no longer equals that of
the pulls ref commit id don't offer to delete the branch on the pull screen
and don't list it as merged on branches.
Fix#9201
When looking at the pull page we should also get the commits from the refs/pulls/x/head
Fix#9158
