Per-repository signing keys have never been officially supported, as
they would require users to modify the repository’s config file.
At this point, it is clear that only global signing keys (GPG or SSH)
should be allowed. If we want to introduce per-repository signing keys
in the future, it will require a complete design proposal.
The endpoint will not be removed for repository special signing key, but
it will reference the global signing key.
---------
Signed-off-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
1. Full file highlighting (fix the legacy todo "we should instead
highlight the whole file at once")
* Fix#24383
2. Correctly covert file content encoding
3. Remove dead code, split large for-loop into small functions/blocks to
make code maintainable
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/35863
The old code had a conflict between using HTML attributes vs. style
properties where the style was overriding the previously set HTML
attributes:
```html
<img width="300" height="277.02439470988946" style="width: 275px; height: 0px;">
```
I made it so in all cases only `style` properties are used and the
previous width/height values are now set via `style`. Also I did a
number of much-needed typescript improvements to the file.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
1 Move `IsRepositoryModelOrDirExist` and `CheckCreateRepository` to
service layer
2 Use `gitrepo.Pushxxx` instead of `git.Push` when possible
3 use `gitrepo.Clonexxx` instead of `gitrepo.Clone` when possible
1. Our textarea already has some editor-like feature like tab
indentation, so I thought why not also add insertion of matching closing
quotes/brackets over selected text. This does that.
2. `textareaInsertText` is replaced with `replaceTextareaSelection`
which does the same but create a new edit history entry in the textarea
so CTRL-Z works. The button that inserts tables into the textarea can
now also be reverted via CTRL-Z, which was not possible before.
When migrating issues or pull requests from a big repository, some
issue/pull request maybe deleted when migrating. So that there will be
duplicated issues/pull requests because we are get information with
pagination. This PR introduced a map to record all migrated issue pull
request index when migrating to avoid the failure because of duplicated
records.
Resolves#35994
Do not render code expansion arrows when `DiffBlobExcerptData` is not
available (code file preview, pull conversation diff comment).
---------
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
fix#36071
looks that's because if an svg in hiden env, it's color added by
`fill="url(#a)"` will become not usefull. by ai helping, I think moving
it out of page by position is a good solution. fell free creat a new
pull request if you have a better soluton. Thanks.
<img width="2198" height="1120" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bbf7c171-0b7f-412a-a1bc-aea3f1629636"
/>
---------
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
- Update and autofix most issues
- Corrected variable names to `cutOk`
- Impossible condition in `services/migrations/onedev_test.go` removed
- `modules/setting/config_env.go:128:3` looks like a false-positive,
added nolint
Replace #36032Fix#36030
This PR use `net/smtp` instead of gomail's smtp. Now
github.com/wneessen/go-mail will be used only for generating email
message body.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Follow #36058 for API edit user bug when editing email.
- The Admin Edit User API includes a breaking change. Previously, when
updating a user with an email from an unallowed domain, the request
would succeed but return a warning in the response headers. Now, the
request will fail and return an error in the response body instead.
- Removed `AdminAddOrSetPrimaryEmailAddress` because it will not be used
any where.
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/36058#issuecomment-3600005186
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
A big step towards enabling strict mode in Typescript.
There was definitely a good share of potential bugs while refactoring
this. When in doubt, I opted to keep the potentially broken behaviour.
Notably, the `DOMEvent` type is gone, it was broken and we're better of
with type assertions on `e.target`.
---------
Signed-off-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
