Change the OpenAPI response of `ListWorkflowRuns` to `WorkflowRunsList`
like it is supposed to be.
---------
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR fixes the response format for the OpenAPI Spec of
`ActionsListRepositoryWorkflows`.
It was specified in the OpenAPI spec as returning a `[]*ActionWorkflow`,
but it actually should return a `api.ActionWorkflowResponse`.
The test already expects an `api.ActionWorkflowResponse` like expected.
- Extract FindRunOptions construction logic from ListRuns into buildRunOptions function
- Update TestListRunsWorkflowFiltering and related tests to use actual production code
- Tests now verify production logic instead of duplicating parameter parsing
- Improved error handling by returning errors instead of direct HTTP responses
- Ensures future changes to parameter parsing are properly tested
This addresses the issue where tests were bypassing production code logic,
making them less reliable for catching regressions.
The CheckSuiteID parameter was referencing a non-existent 'check_suite_id'
column in the action_run table. This commit removes the hallucinated database
schema reference while maintaining API compatibility.
Changes:
- Remove CheckSuiteID field from FindRunOptions struct
- Remove check_suite_id database query condition
- Remove parameter handling logic from shared action handler
- Remove related tests for non-functional feature
- Update Swagger docs to indicate parameter is not supported in Gitea API
- Maintain GitHub API compatibility by keeping parameter documented
The check_suite_id parameter is now silently ignored when provided,
with clear documentation that it's not supported in Gitea.
Issue: [link](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/9637)
Changes introduced: I have clarified the problematic terms (`login`,
`login_name`, and `username`) in all affected endpoints.
The changes were made to relevant:
- HTTP endpoint parameters' descriptions
- response/request models' fields
Add missing query parameters to the Swagger documentation for the workflow runs listing endpoint to match GitHub's API: actor, branch, event, status, created, exclude_pull_requests, check_suite_id, and head_sha.
Implements additional query parameters for the workflow runs API to match GitHub's REST API specification.
- Add `exclude_pull_requests` query parameter
- Add `check_suite_id` parameter
- Add `created` parameter with date range and comparison support
- Add workflow-specific endpoint `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/workflows/{workflow_id}/runs`
Builds on the workflow API foundation from #33964 to provide additional GitHub API compatibility.
Reference: https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/workflow-runs?apiVersion=2022-11-28#list-workflow-runs-for-a-workflow
enable nolintlint scope requirement
add comments to new directives so it's more obvious why they are in
place
---
I can also toggle the mandatory comments on if that's something of
interest.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Follow up the "editor" refactor, use the same approach to simplify code,
and fix some docs & comments
---------
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
This PR fixes a state de-synchronization bug with the issue stopwatch,
it resolves the issue by replacing the ambiguous `/toggle` endpoint
with two explicit endpoints: `/start` and `/stop`.
- The "Start timer" button now exclusively calls the `/start` endpoint.
- The "Stop timer" button now exclusively calls the `/stop` endpoint.
This ensures the user's intent is clearly communicated to the server,
eliminating the state inconsistency and fixing the bug.
---------
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
The merge-upstream route was so far performing any kind of merge, even
those that would create merge commits and thus make your branch diverge
from upstream, requiring manual intervention via the git cli to undo the
damage.
With the new optional parameter ff_only, we can instruct gitea to error
out, if a non-fast-forward merge would be performed.
This adds a new field, "tag_message", that represents the message of the
annotated tag.
Resolves#31835.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
* Signed SSH commits can look in the UI like on GitHub, just like gpg keys today in Gitea
* SSH format can be added in gitea config
* SSH Signing worked before with DEFAULT_TRUST_MODEL=committer
`TRUSTED_SSH_KEYS` can be a list of additional ssh public key contents
to trust for every user of this instance
Closes#34329
Related #31392
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
If user leaves the page, the context will become cancelled, so that the
update process maybe terminal in an unexpected status. This PR haven't
resolve the problem totally. It uses a background context to not cancel
the update process even if the user leaved the pull request view page.
Fix#31779
Similar to #34544, this PR changes the `opts` argument in
`SearchRepositoryByName()` to be passed by value instead of by pointer,
as its mutations do not escape the function scope and are not used
elsewhere. This simplifies reasoning about the function and avoids
unnecessary pointer usage.
This insight emerged during an initial attempt to refactor
`RenderUserSearch()`, which currently intermixes multiple concerns.
---------
Co-authored-by: Philip Peterson <philip-peterson@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR changes the `opts` argument in `SearchUsers()` to be passed by
value instead of by pointer, as its mutations do not escape the function
scope and are not used elsewhere. This simplifies reasoning about the
function and avoids unnecessary pointer usage.
This insight emerged during an initial attempt to refactor
`RenderUserSearch()`, which currently intermixes multiple concerns.
Co-authored-by: Philip Peterson <philip-peterson@users.noreply.github.com>
- Change CreateVariable API response status from 204 No Content to 201
Created
- Update related integration tests to expect 201 Created instead of 204
No Content
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
Change the response status code of the Create Variable API under both
Org and Repo levels to `201` instead of 204.
API SDK: https://gitea.com/gitea/go-sdk/pulls/713
---------
Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: appleboy <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
- Add support for filtering commits by date range via new "since" and
"until" parameters
- Update API endpoints and command logic to handle the new parameters
for fetching commits within given dates
- Extend API documentation and Swagger specs to describe the new "since"
and "until" query parameters
- Refactor related function signatures and implementations to accept and
pass "since" and "until" values
---------
Signed-off-by: appleboy <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
In the Gitea GUI, the user can see the time that _AccessTokens_ and
_PublicKeys_ were last used. This information is not returned by the
_/users/{username}/tokens_ and _/user/keys_ endpoints in the API. This
PR adds the missing data.
The time of last usage for for _tokens_ & _keys_ seem to be stored in
the _Updated_ field of the structs internally. For consistency, I have
used the name _updated_at_ for the new field returned by the _API_.
However, for the _API_ user, I don't think that name reflects the data
returned, as I believe it is the time of last usage. I propose that we
use the name _last_used_at_ instead. Let's hear reviewers opinion on
that.
* PublicKey
1. _last_used_at_: string($date-time)
* AccessToken
1. _created_at_: string($date-time) (for parity with public keys)
2. _last_used_at_: string($date-time)
Fix#34313
Fix#880
Design:
1. A global setting `security.TWO_FACTOR_AUTH`.
* To support org-level config, we need to introduce a better "owner
setting" system first (in the future)
2. A user without 2FA can login and may explore, but can NOT read or
write to any repositories via API/web.
3. Keep things as simple as possible.
* This option only aggressively suggest users to enable their 2FA at the
moment, it does NOT guarantee that users must have 2FA before all other
operations, it should be good enough for real world use cases.
* Some details and tests could be improved in the future since this
change only adds a check and seems won't affect too much.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
`[repository.pull-request] DELAY_CHECK_FOR_INACTIVE_DAYS` is a new
setting to delay the mergeable check for pull requests that have been
inactive for the specified number of days.
This avoids potentially long delays for big repositories with many pull
requests. and reduces system load overall when there are many
repositories or pull requests.
When viewing the PR, checking will start immediately and the PR merge
box will automatically reload when complete. Accessing the PR through
the API will also start checking immediately.
The default value of `7` provides a balance between system load, and
keeping behavior similar to what it was before both for users and API
access. With `0` all conflict checking will be delayed, while `-1`
always checks immediately to restore the previous behavior.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Adds an API POST endpoint under `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/file-contents`
which receives a list of paths and returns a list of the contents of
these files.
This API endpoint will be helpful for applications like headless CMS
(reference: https://github.com/sveltia/sveltia-cms/issues/198) which
need to retrieve a large number of files by reducing the amount of
needed API calls.
Close#33495
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
