Files that should be stored in LFS and are uploaded/edited from the API
or web UI aren't stored in LFS. This may be a regression from #34154.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR adds the label _state_ to the metric _gitea_users_. With the
change, _gitea_users_ would be reported like this:
```
...
# HELP gitea_users Number of Users
# TYPE gitea_users gauge
gitea_users{state="active"} 20
gitea_users{state="inactive"} 10
...
```
The metrics above would be from a Gitea instance with 30 user accounts.
20 of the accounts are active and 10 of the accounts are not active.
Resolve#34325
In the Gitea GUI, the user can see the time that _AccessTokens_ and
_PublicKeys_ were last used. This information is not returned by the
_/users/{username}/tokens_ and _/user/keys_ endpoints in the API. This
PR adds the missing data.
The time of last usage for for _tokens_ & _keys_ seem to be stored in
the _Updated_ field of the structs internally. For consistency, I have
used the name _updated_at_ for the new field returned by the _API_.
However, for the _API_ user, I don't think that name reflects the data
returned, as I believe it is the time of last usage. I propose that we
use the name _last_used_at_ instead. Let's hear reviewers opinion on
that.
* PublicKey
1. _last_used_at_: string($date-time)
* AccessToken
1. _created_at_: string($date-time) (for parity with public keys)
2. _last_used_at_: string($date-time)
Fix#34313
If archive downloads are are disabled using
_DISABLE_DOWNLOAD_SOURCE_ARCHIVES_, archive links are still returned by
the API.
This PR changes the data returned, so the fields _zipball_url_ and
_tarball_url_ are omitted if archive downloads have been disabled.
Resolve#32159
Fix#34224
The previous implementation in #33744 will get the pushed commits
changed files. But it's not always right when push a merged commit. This
PR reverted the logic in #33744 and will always get the PR's changed
files and get code owners.
Fix#880
Design:
1. A global setting `security.TWO_FACTOR_AUTH`.
* To support org-level config, we need to introduce a better "owner
setting" system first (in the future)
2. A user without 2FA can login and may explore, but can NOT read or
write to any repositories via API/web.
3. Keep things as simple as possible.
* This option only aggressively suggest users to enable their 2FA at the
moment, it does NOT guarantee that users must have 2FA before all other
operations, it should be good enough for real world use cases.
* Some details and tests could be improved in the future since this
change only adds a check and seems won't affect too much.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
